Technical Due Diligence

Technical Due Diligence

Summary

The guide investors and acquirers wish existed, how to assess a codebase, team, and architecture for risk before you write the check, with a repeatable checklist and red-flag catalogue.

Loading What Technical DD Actually Answers…
Loading Scoping the Engagement…
Loading The Codebase Assessment…
Loading Architecture & Scalability…
Loading The Team & Key-Person Risk…
Loading Security & Compliance…
Loading Operations & Reliability…
Loading Dependencies & Licensing…
Loading Process & Velocity…
Loading Red Flags & Deal-Breakers…
Loading Writing the Report…
Loading The Checklist…
Loading About Roger…

Do you like my content?

Sponsor Me On Github

Keep reading

GTM Engineering with Agents: A Field Guide to Automating the Funnel

GTM Engineering with Agents: A Field Guide to Automating the Funnel

Every go-to-market team is really running a handful of pipelines. Leads come in, get cleaned up, get scored, get worked, and either turn into revenue or quietly rot. Most of that work is mechanical, and most of it gets done by hand or by a tangle of point-to-point integrations that break the moment a vendor changes an endpoint. This guide takes the agentic approach the rest of the series is built on and points it straight at the funnel. The idea is simple: wrap every source you care about (your CRM, your enrichment providers, your email, your product analytics) as an MCP tool, then let small agents orchestrate the motions on top of them. Capture, enrichment, scoring, outbound, nurture, hygiene, forecasting, churn signals. One tool surface, many agents, each running on a schedule. It's hands-on. We build each motion as a small agent loop over MCP tools, wire them together with a cron, and put guardrails around the parts that can email a customer or overwrite a record. By the end you'll have a mental model for GTM as a system of agents, plus enough concrete patterns to start replacing the manual busywork on your own stack. It pairs with [MCP from Scratch](/guides/mcp-from-scratch) for the protocol and [Running the Fleet](/guides/running-the-fleet) for orchestration. This one is about pointing all of that at pipeline. _This is a living document and will be updated as the tools and patterns evolve._

Read guide
AI Project Management: Shipping Software When Agents Write the Code

AI Project Management: Shipping Software When Agents Write the Code

Something strange happened to my job this year. The typing got cheap. An agent can turn a paragraph of intent into a working pull request while I refill my coffee, and yet the projects did not get faster. Not really. More code shipped, more PRs merged, and somehow the same features took roughly the same number of weeks to actually land. That gap is what this guide is about. When machines write the code, the scarce thing is no longer the writing. It's the specifying, the slicing-up, and the reviewing. Project management stopped being about handing out work and started being about feeding agents instructions clear enough that their output is worth keeping, then catching the parts that aren't. I've been running this way for a while now: specs before code, work cut into agent-sized pieces, a small fleet on separate worktrees, and a review loop that assumes the machine got something subtly wrong. This is the playbook I wish someone had handed me. It covers spec-driven development, decomposition, acceptance criteria an agent can test against, parallelism without chaos, the review loop, governance for code you didn't write, and the handful of metrics that tell you whether any of it is actually working. It's written for engineers and tech leads who already use agents to write code and want to run real projects with them, not demos. _This is a living document and will be updated as the tools and the workflows keep evolving._

Read guide