I like the proposed <picture> markup except for the tag name. “Picture” is much more specific than “image”, and I bet a very large portion of images used on the web are not pictures. “Photo” would be worse, but “picture” still implies a complete photo, illustration, or diagram, whereas “image” encompasses those plus patterns, textures, gradients, and every other use of image data in use on the web today.
How about using that proposed <picture> markup but instead calling the top-level tag <image>?
I have to agree with Marco on this, “Picture” really doesn’t describe this tag properly, simply because a lot of images on the web are not pictures necessarily.
Imagine if <music> had been used instead of <audio>? Yes, a lot of audio used on the web is music, but there are also podcasts, talks, etc.. Or if <movie> was used instead of <video>?
Keeping this in mind, I’d like to vote for <image> over <picture> as well…
It definitely fits better, and goes along the lines of <video> and <audio> better
Filed Under: Links